๐—ง๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—š๐Ÿฑ ๐˜ƒ๐˜€ ๐—ฆ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐—ฑ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ผ๐—ป ๐Ÿด ๐—š๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐Ÿฏ: ๐—•๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ธ๐˜€ ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐˜€๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜€

The Google Pixel 10 series has finally arrived, bringing along the brand-new Tensor G5 chipset, which promises major upgrades over last yearโ€™s Tensor G4. Google claims this is the biggest leap yet for Tensor chips, delivering a significant performance boost. However, despite all the improvements, the Tensor G5 still falls short against Qualcommโ€™s Snapdragon 8 Elite in raw power (check out our detailed comparison here).

That said, the real question is: Can the Tensor G5 outperform the two-year-old Snapdragon 8 Gen 3? Letโ€™s break down the benchmark results to find out.

๐—ง๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—š๐Ÿฑ ๐˜ƒ๐˜€ ๐—ฆ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐—ฑ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ผ๐—ป ๐Ÿด ๐—š๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐Ÿฏ: ๐—”๐—ป๐—ง๐˜‚๐—ง๐˜‚ ๐—•๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ธ

(๐˜š๐˜ค๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด ๐˜ฃ๐˜ข๐˜ด๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ฌ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ฃ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ค๐˜ฉ๐˜ฎ๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ฌ๐˜ด; ๐˜ธ๐˜ฆโ€™๐˜ญ๐˜ญ ๐˜ถ๐˜ฑ๐˜ฅ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ค๐˜ฆ ๐˜ธ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ด๐˜ต ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฅ๐˜ฆ๐˜ท๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ฆ๐˜ด ๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ณ๐˜ด๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ท๐˜ฆ๐˜ด. ๐˜›๐˜ฆ๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ ๐˜—๐˜ช๐˜น๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ 10 ๐˜—๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ ๐˜Ÿ๐˜“ ๐˜ง๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ ๐˜›๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ด๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ ๐˜Ž5 ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ ๐˜Ž๐˜ข๐˜ญ๐˜ข๐˜น๐˜บ ๐˜š24 ๐˜œ๐˜ญ๐˜ต๐˜ณ๐˜ข ๐˜ง๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ ๐˜š๐˜ฏ๐˜ข๐˜ฑ๐˜ฅ๐˜ณ๐˜ข๐˜จ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ 8 ๐˜Ž๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ 3.)

When it comes to AnTuTu scores, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 still dominates. It scored a massive 1,768,372 points, while the Tensor G5 managed 1,140,286 โ€” thatโ€™s roughly a 55% performance gap overall.

๐—•๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ธ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ถ๐˜ ๐—ฑ๐—ผ๐˜„๐—ป ๐—ณ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฟ:

๐—–๐—ฃ๐—จ ๐—ฃ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฒ: Snapdragon leads with 441,650 points, around 41% higher than Tensorโ€™s 313,500.

๐—š๐—ฃ๐—จ ๐—ฃ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฒ: This is where Qualcomm flexes its muscles, with the Snapdragon showing a 66% advantage โ€” great news for gaming and graphics-heavy tasks.

๐— ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜†: Snapdragon scores 371,609 vs Tensorโ€™s 246,571, ensuring faster app loading and better multitasking.

๐—จ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—˜๐˜…๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฒ (๐—จ๐—ซ): Qualcomm pulls ahead again with 302,008 vs Tensorโ€™s 185,520.

๐—ฉ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐˜

While the Tensor G5 is a big step forward for Googleโ€™s Pixel lineup, it still canโ€™t match the raw power of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3. For everyday use, youโ€™ll still see improvements on the Pixel 10 series, but if top-tier performance, gaming, and graphics are your priorities, Snapdragon remains the clear winner here.

๐—ง๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—š๐Ÿฑ ๐˜ƒ๐˜€ ๐—ฆ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐—ฑ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ผ๐—ป ๐Ÿด ๐—š๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐Ÿฏ ๐—š๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ธ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ต ๐˜€๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ

On Geekbench, the results tell a slightly different story compared to AnTuTu. Here, the Tensor G5 actually manages to edge past the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 in single-core performance, scoring 2,296 against Snapdragonโ€™s 2,216. The difference isnโ€™t huge, but it does show that Google has made notable improvements in single-threaded tasks.

However, when it comes to multi-core performance, the tables turn. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 still comes out ahead with a score of 6,791, which is about 9.5% higher than the Tensor G5โ€™s 6,203.

In short, while Tensor G5 shines in single-core speed, Qualcommโ€™s chipset retains the upper hand in overall multi-core power โ€” making it better suited for demanding workloads and heavy multitasking.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *